US Supreme Court begins trial that could change the way social networks operate

[ad_1]

Ministers are analyzing two laws, from Texas and Florida, that attempt to contain content moderation and the deletion of posts on platforms. These legislations respond to complaints from talkative politicians in both states. Monument “The Contemplation of Justice” positioned outside the US Supreme Court Evelyn Hockstein/REUTERS The Supreme Court of the United States began judging this Monday (26) two actions that could change the way Facebook, Instagram TikTok, X (formerly Twitter) and other social networks operate today. US STF ministers analyze two laws approved in 2021 in the states of Texas and Florida. While details vary, both legislation aims to address complaints from conservative politicians that social media companies are liberal-leaning and censoring users based on their views. Texas and Florida want to prevent social networks from moderating posted content and are against removing posts. The laws in these two states were passed months after Facebook and Twitter’s decisions to ban Donald Trump because of his posts related to the January 6 attack on the US Capitol by his supporters, according to information from the AP agency. In a statement when he signed the bill, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said the measure would be “protection against Silicon Valley elites.” Associations representing social media companies filed suit in Federal Court, alleging that the laws violate the platforms’ speech rights. A federal appeal overturned the Florida decision, while another upheld the Texas law. The ruling prompted Governor DeSantis to appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump’s lawyers filed a brief in the Florida case asking the court to uphold state law. Next steps According to The New York Time (NYT), the ministers are beginning to gather arguments in both cases and the decision could come out in June 2024. The NYT states that, if the Supreme Court presents a result favorable to the states, the companies Social media can have “political and economic impacts”. Experts also believe that platforms can create a different feed just to house content from these states. Several academics and privacy advocacy groups told the court they view the laws at issue in these cases as unconstitutional, but want the justices to preserve governments’ ability to regulate social media companies to some extent. Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for damage caused to his social networks Mark Zuckerberg apologizes for damage caused to his social networks How Gemini, Google’s most powerful artificial intelligence, works How Gemini, Google’s most powerful artificial intelligence, works How to report posts on Instagram, TikTok and Kwai and other social networks How to report posts on Instagram, TikTok and Kwai and other social networks READ ALSO: Samsung reveals first image of the Galaxy Ring, its smart ring focused on health Color-changing dress: digital clothing changes the look with a twist Why the landing of an American company’s spacecraft on the Moon is considered ‘historic’

[ad_2]

Source link