State secretaries of education present to the MEC a proposal with changes in the New High School

[ad_1]

Document can be used in the production of the final report on the guidelines of the educational stage. Despite this, sources heard by g1 say that the ministry does not seek support from entities. New Secondary Education brings significant changes in the training of students. FIEC/Marília Camelo The state secretaries of education closed a proposal with changes in the New Secondary School that will be delivered this Monday (3) to the Ministry of Education (MEC). One of the points defended is the possibility of reducing the workload of elective subjects. Context: In force for 2 years, the new model has been the target of criticism. Some groups advocate its complete repeal while others call only for tweaks. Faced with pressure, the MEC opened a public consultation with the promise of presenting a solution at the end of the discussions. The deadline, which has already been extended, ends this Thursday (6). The strategy of the National Council of Secretaries of Education (Consed) when delivering its proposal is to make its position in relation to the model public. Behind the scenes, entities have complained that they have not been heard by the government. Questioned by g1, the MEC did not comment on the criticism. Proposals from the education secretariats The document prepared by Consed was constructed with the participation of secretaries and technicians from the state networks. The forecast was that it would be delivered during a public hearing promoted by the MEC scheduled for this Monday. For Maria Helena Guimarães de Castro, former president of the National Council of Education (CNE), who participated in one of the meetings between MEC and Consed, the suggestions in the document should include: Increasing the workload of basic general training and reducing the hours of optional subjects; Guarantee the offer a technical itinerary; and Definition of guiding groups and reformulation of training itineraries. The position of secretaries is important because secondary education is the responsibility of state governments. So, whatever change is approved at the level of education, the state secretariats will be primarily responsible for implementation. “MEC wants to do everything alone” In recent months, MEC has promoted meetings with education professionals, specialists and organized sectors of society to discuss the New High School. However, critical entities to the folder. “The MEC called the entities to draw up a report together, but that is not what is happening. They want to draw up the report [que vai guiar as mudanças do ensino médio] and wants the entities to sign, but they don’t have their finger on the text”, says a representative of one of the entities participating in the discussion. “The MEC document is not following what is being discussed and is not being prepared with the support of the entities”. Public consultation In addition to listening to entities and organized sectors, the MEC holds, until July 6, a public consultation to find out what the population thinks about the new secondary education and which direction the teaching stage should follow. ministry, 91,891 people had given their opinion on the subject by 12:00 am this Monday. To participate, simply access bit.ly/consultapublicaonlinemec or send the word MEC to (11) 97715-4092 on WhatsApp. It is also possible to give your opinion through the website Participate + Brazil at www.gov.br/participamaisbrasil/reestruturacao-da-politica-nacional-de-ensino-medio with login gov.br. The collected data will originate a report that will be attached to the ministry’s final document on the teaching stage What’s at stake The new secondary education was approved by Law 13,415 of 2017 and started to be applied in 2022. The main change was the flexibility of the curriculum, which, in theory, allows the student to choose an area of ​​knowledge or technical course to go deeper. In addition, the new model also added basic general training disciplines to areas of knowledge and increased the workload of school days. With the changes, students, teachers and entities in the area argue that there has been a drop in the quality of teaching, a decrease in the time dedicated to basic training and prioritization of training itineraries that do not play a fundamental role in student training. There was, then, a division between the sectors. Part requests that the format be revoked, ceasing to be implemented as a whole. Another part advocates that the model be improved, correcting flaws and optimizing what has already been put into practice. After the end of the public consultation, the ministry must prepare a report with an opinion that will direct the next decisions on secondary education in the country.

[ad_2]

Source link