PGR asks the STF to open an investigation against Janones over an alleged “crack”

PGR asks the STF to open an investigation against Janones over an alleged “crack”

[ad_1]

The Attorney General’s Office (PGR) asked the Federal Supreme Court (STF) this Friday (1st) to open an investigation against federal deputy André Janones (Avante-MG) to investigate the alleged practice of “cracking” in his cabinet. In audios attributed to the parliamentarian, he demands the return of part of the salaries of his office employees at the time to help him cover election campaign expenses. The allegations were published this week by the portal Metropolises.

The request forwarded to the STF was signed by the Deputy Attorney General of the Republic, Ana Borges Coêlho. For her, there is “sufficient suggestive evidence” of crimes such as criminal association, embezzlement and concussion, the newspaper reported. The globe. In the document, Coêlho highlighted that the investigation is necessary to clarify whether the parliamentarian “associated himself” with his advisors “for the specific purpose of committing crimes against the public administration”.

The PGR requested that steps be taken within the scope of the investigation, such as statements from Janones and former advisors who accuse him of practicing rachadinha. Furthermore, the deputy attorney requested that the Chamber of Deputies send the STF information about all advisors who have already worked and who still work in the deputy’s office.

“One cannot rule out, on the other hand, the possibility that federal deputy André Luis Gaspar Janones demanded, for himself, directly, due to the parliamentary mandate, undue economic advantages from advisors and former advisors, as a condition for their maintenance in the commission positions in his office”, wrote the deputy attorney.

Opposition called for investigation against Janones

On Tuesday (28), federal deputy Delegate Paulo Bilynskyj (PL-SP) filed a criminal report with the PGR against Janones. The complaint was signed by more than 40 opposition deputies. They ask for the revocation of Janones’ mandate based on Law No. 8,429/92, which provides for punishments for the crime of administrative improbity.

Former federal deputy Deltan Dallagnol (Novo-PR) also presented a criminal report against the parliamentarian to the PGR. The Liberal Party (PL) sent a request to revoke Janones’ mandate to the Board of Directors of the Chamber.

Earlier this week, Janones denied any wrongdoing and called the accusations “fake news” and blamed the “extreme right.” “Today an article came out, which is being spread by the extreme right, which accuses me of splitting, something I have never done. To do this, they used a clandestine and criminal recording, an audio taken out of context and to try to accuse me of a crime that I never committed”, said the parliamentarian on the social network X, shortly after the audios were released.

According to the legislation, the practice of embezzlement occurs when a public official appropriates “money, valuables or any other movable asset, public or private, which he or she has possession of due to his or her position, or diverts it, for his or her own benefit. or someone else”, whereas concussion is defined as “demanding, for oneself or for others, directly or indirectly, even if outside the role or before assuming it, but as a result of it, an undue advantage”.

[ad_2]

Source link