Gleisi attacks Congress and says that amendments are “usurpation” of the functions of the presidency
[ad_1]
The national president of the PT, Gleisi Hoffmann, classified the approval of the 2024 Annual Budget Law by Congress as a “usurpation of the functions of the Executive Branch” – that is, the presidency of the Republic. The criticism was made in reference to the record forwarding of parliamentary amendments in next year’s budget, which reached R$53 billion with mandatory payment.
The budget was approved in the middle of the afternoon this Friday (22) after days of negotiations and impasse between the Legislature and the government, in which President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) was defeated after seeing, among other points, the cut in part of the New PAC investments from R$61.3 billion to R$54 billion.
“In a country that needs structuring investments, parliament investing in the dispersion of resources to meet its interests is irresponsible. It is a usurpation of the functions of the Executive Branch”, attacked the PT president on a social network (look here).
According to Gleisi Hoffmann, parliamentarians promoted “a huge distortion in a country that needs large investments to grow”. “There must be reasonableness in parliamentary amendments, which must be complementary to government programs”, he added.
Despite attacking the Legislature, Gleisi defended the allocation of R$4.9 billion to the electoral fund for the 2024 elections, equal to that used in last year’s election and double the amount for the 2020 municipal election. She considered that this is the price to pay for democracy.
“I’m against [os questionamentos]I am in favor of the R$4.9 billion fund, this is essential, democracy has a cost, it has a price, it cannot be privatized, I defend that”, he said in the early afternoon.
On the other hand, the president of the Senate, Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG), classified the amount set aside to finance next year’s campaign as an “error”. He argued that it should be the same as in 2020 adjusted for inflation in the period, which would reach R$2.7 billion.
[ad_2]
Source link