Chamber and Senate committees approve hearing on Enem with Minister of Education

[ad_1]

Invitations were approved after mobilization by the agribusiness bench against questions from the test administered last Sunday (5). Camilo Santana is not required to attend. Question 89, from the white notebook, from the first day of Enem, is one of those contested by the Anglo agribusiness bench. A committee from the Chamber and another from the Senate approved this Wednesday (8) invitations to hear the Minister of Education, Camilo Santana, about questions related to agribusiness on the first day of the National High School Exam (Enem) test, administered last Sunday (5). The requests were approved by the boards of Education, in the Chamber, and of Agriculture, in the Senate, after mobilization of the “agricultural bench” in Congress. Initially, all requests analyzed were for summons — when the minister is obliged to attend — but were converted into invitations — optional presence. In the Chamber’s Education Committee, the expectation is that Camilo will be heard on the 22nd, in a joint hearing with the House’s Agriculture and Inspection and Control committees. There is still no forecast of when the session of the Senate Agriculture Committee will take place. Agriculture bench points out ideological bias in ENEM 2023 issues Criticisms of questions The invitations were approved two days after the Parliamentary Agricultural Front (FPA) asked the federal government for explanations on three issues in the first part of Enem which, in the bench’s assessment, ” discriminate” against the Brazilian agricultural sector. Note released by the FPA requests the cancellation of questions 89, 70 and 71 — reference numbers for the white test. The entity argued that the questions “are poorly formulated, solely ideological” and allow “the student to select any answer, depending on their point of view.” The document also anticipated the movement to summon Camilo Santana to provide clarifications in Congress. Question 89 addressed negative factors in agribusiness in the Cerrado, mentioning, for example, the “overexploitation of workers” and “poison rains” (a reference to the use of pesticides). Question 71 deals with the new space race financed by billionaires, discussing the perspectives it points to. Item 70 has as its motto the advancement of soybean cultivation and deforestation in the Amazon. Question 71 of the white notebook, 1st day of Enem 2023. Anglo Enem was prepared with technical criteria, says Inep In a hearing at the Chamber’s Education Committee, this Wednesday morning, the president of the National Institute of Educational Studies and Research Anísio Teixeira (Inep ), Manuel Palácios, stated that Enem 2023 was prepared based on technical and objective criteria. Palácios said that the test questions were prepared by basic education and university teachers selected in 2020, still during the Jair Bolsonaro (PL) administration. “We are talking about teachers who were selected in 2020 and who are still carrying out this activity today. If there is any type of biased selection, it has been biased for a long time,” said the president of Inep, the body responsible for Enem. “In fact, there is nothing more than the public selection of education professionals through objective curriculum criteria. ”, declared Manuel Palácios. The Minister of Education, Camilo Santana, is not obliged to attend the committees to which he was invited Thiago Gadelha/Sistema Verdes Mares

[ad_2]

Source link