Amnesty for Bolsonaro embarrasses Tarcísio with allies – 10/09/2023 – Power
[ad_1]
The bill by Tarcísio de Freitas (Republicans) that includes amnesty for fines applied during the Covid-19 pandemic faces obstruction from the opposition and has created new embarrassment between the governor and his allies in the Legislative Assembly of São Paulo. The text should be voted on this week.
The Bolsonaro government wants to approve a proposal that facilitates the collection of active debt, a measure that has the support of most parliamentarians. The issue is the so-called tortoise of the project — an article that forgives debts from pandemic fines and which is seen as a benefit for former president Jair Bolsonaro (PL).
For not wearing a mask and causing crowds, Bolsonaro was fined by the administration of João Doria (PSDB) at least six times. The debt already reaches R$1.1 million, and the government started to charge the former president in ongoing legal actions.
Bolsonaro even deposited the amount as a guarantee. For your defense and for experts consulted by Sheet, the amnesty should apply to his case, since the debt was not paid. The bill prohibits refunds for those who have already paid the fine.
Since winning the election, Tarcísio had been under pressure to amnesty the fines applied during the Doria administration. Parliamentarians claim that the governor made this commitment and, therefore, there was revolt among the allied base when the government decided to charge the former president in court.
The project is seen as a concession by Tarcísio to his political godfather and, to accentuate the debates in the House, there is also the fact that one of the deputies who will vote on the matter, Bolsonaro supporter Gil Diniz (PL), was also fined and is registered in active debt.
Gil claims that he paid the debt of R$813, but the government says that the deputy is still “awaiting a decision on the appeal regarding the fine.”
PSOL leader, deputy Mônica Seixas stated in plenary last Wednesday (4) that Gil will forgive his own debt. Paulo Fiorilo, leader of the PT, said that the House cannot legislate for its own sake.
Marcia Lia (PT) stated that the text “benefits the king’s friends to the detriment of the poor people”. Deputies ponder behind the scenes that approving the amnesty will bring unnecessary strain to the Legislature.
Other Assembly deputies, such as Danilo Balas (PL) and Tomé Abduch (Republicans), were fined, but paid. Tarcísio himself received three fines and, according to his advisor, paid off the debts before taking over the government.
In addition to Bolsonaro, there are other Bolsonaro federal deputies with outstanding debt, such as Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL-SP, R$ 136 thousand) and Mario Frias (PL-SP, R$ 716).
The progress of the project adds to a series of difficulties in articulation between Tarcísio and his base. This time, the governor is being attacked by both the Bolsonarists and the other parties that support him.
Bolsonaro supporters are dissatisfied because the government accepted an agreement with the opposition so that article 36, which deals with fines, is voted on separately from the rest of the project.
The core of the proposal on active debt should be approved without difficulty, but the separate vote on article 36 forces base deputies to vote “yes” specifically on the device that benefits Bolsonaro — which many are not willing to do.
In the view of Bolsonaro deputies, by highlighting the article, the government acted to save the main project and threw the part that interests the former president to the lions. In other words, he made a nod to the radical right by submitting the amnesty to the House, but he was not concerned with approval.
Who has the fine registered in the active debt
- Jair Bolsonaro (former president) – R$1.1 million
- Gil Diniz (PL state deputy) – R$813
- Eduardo Bolsonaro (PL federal deputy) – R$ 136 thousand
- Mario Frias (PL federal deputy) – R$716
During last year’s campaign, Tarcísio sought to differentiate himself from Bolsonaro’s denialist stance and highlighted having been vaccinated. Once in government, he took a photo with Zé Gotinha, but was criticized for vetoing a HPV vaccination campaign project.
At Alesp, Bolsonaro supporters complain that the Palácio dos Bandeirantes has not acted to obtain votes in favor of article 36. Deputies like Gil and Lucas Bove (PL) are the ones who are looking for their peers to argue that the amnesty is not just valid for Bolsonaro — they are 10,163 fines for clandestine establishments and parties and 579 for passers-by, totaling R$72 million.
Party leaders, however, report having been approached by the Secretary of the Civil House, Arthur Lima (PP), to ask for a vote in favor of the amnesty.
Among deputies allied with parties such as PSDB, União Brasil and even in the non-Bolsonarist PL, the amnesty is criticized. Firstly because the proposal is stamped as something designed to free Bolsonaro.
Secondly, deputies claim that it is an injustice to traders who have adapted to the restrictions. They remember that Alesp itself made a series of sacrifices during the pandemic, cutting funding.
Opposition parties, such as PT and PSOL, decided to obstruct the vote, which prolonged the discussion in the plenary for hours.
So far, there are five actions that demand fines from Bolsonaro. The former president filed a lawsuit to cancel one of the debts and asks the court to accept the seizure of an apartment in Brasília instead of the cash value.
The ex-president’s defense argues that there was a misuse of purpose in the application of fines, as the government standard provided for a fine of around R$525 for anyone who did not wear a mask — but the ex-president’s punishments, in the context of motorcycling and crowds , ranged from R$47 thousand to R$320 thousand.
Tarcísio’s allies also see a political move by Doria in fining Bolsonaro, as the former governor antagonized the former president during the pandemic.
In justifying the project, the government argues that there is a high cost in processing thousands of small-value debts and that businesspeople have already suffered several financial losses during the pandemic.
[ad_2]
Source link
