The cry of the Porcines by Moro Santeiro – 06/08/2023 – Reinaldo Azevedo

Deltan Dallagnol was impeached; Sergio Moro is in the queue of fate; there are strong indications that Tony Garcia, twice a snitch in the “Russian Republic”, was at the same time his victim and his infiltrator; Evidences are mounting that our “Period of Terror” hides more spells than even its toughest critics, such as this scribe, supposed. There are many elements indicating that a criminal organization was set up under the pretext of fighting crime. That has a name, doesn’t it?, when it involves people without toga and collar: “militia”. This too, it should be noted, is structured to elect its own. If there is a disaster in the political ecology, he can reach the Presidency of the Republic.

The weeping of the Porcinas de Moro Santeiro widows and the hollow-faced sanctimonious people who are running around in columnists, denouncing the supposed end of the fight against corruption, could even be moving, were it not for the evil that these people helped to perpetrate against due process of law as concrete manifestation; against the rule of law as an abstract value; against democracy as a civilizing pact; against the economy as a source of wealth and employment and, yes!, against politics as the best of the worst ways of equating differences in public life.

The country, the law and analysts are not divided between “lava-jatistas” and “anti-lava-jatistas”. The assumption is stupid because, in this perspective, the second would be a function, in a mathematical sense, of the first. Legal, moral and ethical perverts who gave intellectual support to Lava Jato in the most varied areas seek, for example, to associate the always-on-going messes at the center with the dismantling of the operation, which would imply a green light to corruption.

Farce. Fallacy. Attempt to do by trickery what the cat does by instinct. In the filthy and self-interested pity of these brave men (no bows here), the task force was essentially good, but ended up deviating halfway through for who knows why. And, of course! Those who have always fought it would have done so for bad reasons, while they, the monopolists of good, supported it out of nobility of character.

And even? I dismantle the nonsense: what we call “centrão” has been in the government since the Constituent Assembly, when it was structured. But he only actually came to power and started to call the shots, including in the Executive, in the management of Jair Bolsonaro, whom the sycophants of illegalism helped to elect. Those distracted notice that I make a distinction between being government and being power; between dominating the process and being its beneficiary or lesser beneficiary.

Ten years after the fall of the fuckers and the subsequent and inevitable winter, the obvious is clear: a very high price is always paid for attacking institutions. The unconditional adherence of a considerable part of the press to the MPF’s “black blocs”, under the command of a condemning judge, fueled the process of “demonization of politics” as a relationship of equally virtuous exchanges. I use quotation marks to highlight the expression because those widows — and some profited a lot from the image maker — have now taken to… demonizing it! It would be just another way to protect corrupt people.

The worst corruption, and for this one there is no chain, is that of character. Anti-wash-jetting is not one of two factions in a bandit fight. This is an imperative of decency in the face of car wash as a proven counterfeit of Justice. Following the rules of the game, in a democratic regime, or fighting to change them also according to the discipline one has, is a virtue. The crimes that were committed in the name of fighting crime have barely begun to come out of basements. And the Pigs? They still have the Raul Gil-style exit: “The rule of law asked, and you didn’t get it right; grab your stool and leave quietly”.

PS: Not to say I didn’t speak etc. In the last column, I referred to the most influential agenda in economic journalism: the “if” as an index of the subject’s indetermination. You’re making a lot of mistakes. Then the economy and income grow more than “se” evaluated; the stock market rises more than “if” expected; the dollar and inflation fall more than “if” bet. Let’s get the “if” out of the closet! Paraphrasing Clarice, we need to appropriate the “if” of the thing.

PRESENT LINK: Did you like this text? Subscriber can release five free hits of any link per day. Just click the blue F below.