Temporal Frame: Fávaro says that producers have been on the land ‘for hundreds of years’; Guajajara asks ‘caution’

[ad_1]

Ministers of Agriculture and Indigenous Peoples differ on the project approved by the Chamber. Text limits demarcation of Indigenous Lands. Ministers Carlos Fávaro (Agriculture) and Sônia Guajajara (Indigenous Peoples) met, separately, this Tuesday (30) with the President of the Senate, Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG). On their way out, the two commented on the proposal for a time frame in the demarcation of indigenous lands, which hours later was approved by the Chamber of Deputies. The project determines that only areas can be reserved for indigenous peoples that were already occupied by them on the day the Federal Constitution was enacted, on October 5, 1988. Fávaro, defender of the matter, said he wanted “pacification”, but that the demarcation of lands cannot occur “to the detriment of producers who have owned properties for hundreds of years”. “I defend pacification. I understand, I understand that indigenous peoples need, in some points, special attention, a larger piece of land. But this cannot be to the detriment of producers who have owned properties for hundreds of years So, we need to find a good term. I understand that this will happen, in moderation”, said the holder of the Agriculture and Livestock portfolio. On the other hand, Guajajara came to ask Pacheco for “caution” in considering the project. The Minister of Indigenous Peoples said that the President of the Senate assured her “participation of all interested parties” in the debate and that the proposal will not be voted “in a haphazard way”. “Being committed does not mean having a majority. There was articulation, conversations. But there are guidelines that unfortunately do not have this understanding and adherence of the majority of the Chamber […] For us, what matters at this moment is for us to guarantee that President Lula’s commitment is fulfilled, which is the unblocking of the demarcation of indigenous territories”, said Guajajara. The leader of the government in the Senate, Jaques Wagner (PT-BA), classified that the way in which the matter was approved by the deputies is “wrong”. “You want to go back 40 years in history. It is unreasonable”, said the senator. Before the vote in the House, Rodrigo Pacheco said that, in the Senate, there will still be “time for debate”. , allowing anyone who wants to debate this topic to also have time in the Senate for this debate. What I said about the search for a consensus is because the characters involved in this issue, the Presidency of the two Houses, the STF, sectors of society can sit at the table to have a dialogue, identify convergence. The vote in the Chamber can inaugurate this phase of conciliation in the course of the debate here in the Senate”, Pacheco pointed out. evaluates a lawsuit involving an indigenous land in Santa Catarina, but the decision will have repercussions on all similar processes in the country. Indigenous lands. That is, it states that the original peoples only have the right to the lands that were already traditionally occupied by them on the day of the enactment of the Federal Constitution, on October 5, 1988. In practice, the thesis allows indigenous people to be expelled from lands they occupy, if it is not proven that they were there before 1988, and does not authorize people who have already been expelled or forced to leave their places of origin to return to the lands. Analysis: STF can invalidate PL of the Temporal Mark

[ad_2]

Source link