Social networks have to disclose how their algorithms work, says Fake News PL rapporteur

[ad_1]

Deputy Orlando Silva participated in a hearing at the STF on the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet; mechanism restricts debate by filtering content, he says. Ministers want platform accountability. Deputy Orlando Silva (PCdoB-SP) defended this Tuesday (28) that social networks detail the operation of algorithms that recommend content to users. Silva is the rapporteur for the Fake News bill, which he is considering in the Chamber. The text has already passed through the Senate, but was urgently rejected last year by the deputies. This morning, the deputy participated in a public hearing at the Federal Supreme Court (STF) on the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet. “The debate we have on the recommendation algorithm, which is at the core of economic activity and which affects social dynamics, needs to be public knowledge”, said the deputy. algorithm selects who can listen or not, who can private the public debate or not.” “The so-called ‘bubbles’ form. That’s why I am absolutely convinced that it is a challenge for the national congress to guarantee transparency in the operation of digital platforms, which we should be inspired by civilizing conquests,” said the congressman. Radio and television associations defend a bill that makes the dissemination of fake news a crime Responsibility of the networks At the opening of the seminar, ministers of the STF and the government defended the update of the Marco Civil with the objective of stipulating rules for the actions of the platforms in relation to content that threatens democracy and the dignity of users. Minister Alexandre de Moraes called the current model inefficient and bankrupt. “It is not possible that just because they are an instrument and depositories of information, they (social networks) are not responsible”, he said. “We have to deepen this discussion. There is a need to improve self-regulation”, he declared. his speech how networks serve as instruments for disinformation, hate speech, reputation assassinations and conspiracy theories. “Freedom of expression is a precious fundamental right, essential for democracy, for the search for the truth possible in a open and plural society. However, disinformation, deliberate lying, hate speech, attack on democracy and incitement to commit crime violate the three fundamentals that justify the protection of freedom of expression”, he said. The Advocate General of the Union, Jorge Messias , highlighted the urgency of the discussion on the accountability of platforms. “It is undeniable the need to impose more responsibility and demand proactivity from the digital platform in the inhibition of illicit acts based on clear parameters such as the manifest practice of crimes”, said the minister.

[ad_2]

Source link