Why did Amy Winehouse and Bob Marley biopics receive criticism before their release?

Why did Amy Winehouse and Bob Marley biopics receive criticism before their release?

[ad_1]

‘Back to Black’ is leaving fans worried and disappointed. ‘One Love’ did not excite film critics. Understand the reasons. Amy Winehouse and Bob Marley biopics are criticized before release In recent weeks, two biopics have been highly commented on: “Back to Black”, by Amy Winehouse, and “One Love”, by Bob Marley. But these comments were not at all positive and appeared before the films were even released. Here at g1 we explain why these two films, which were supposed to be a celebration of two of the most important names in the history of music, have left many people disappointed: ‘Back to Black’ Amy Winehouse at the Glastonbury festival, in England, in June 2008 Ben Stansall/AFP/Archive “Back to black” takes its name from Amy Winehouse’s award-winning album. It was with him that the English singer received five statuettes at the 2006 Grammys. The film is directed by Sam Taylor-Johnson, the same person who made “The Boy From Liverpool”, about the story of a young John Lennon. In other words: “Back to Black” had everything to work out. The director said the film about Amy tells “a wonderfully unique and tragic story of the singer, accompanied by the most important part of her legacy: her music.” But it seems that this comment did not reassure fans. This is because at the beginning of the month several images of scenes from the film were released. And in the clicks, Marisa Abela, who plays the singer, appears with her hair super messy and her makeup all smeared, including that eyeliner that is so characteristic of Amy. In another click, actor Jack O’Connell, who plays Blake Fielder-Civil, the singer’s controversial boyfriend, appears in handcuffs. In real life, Blake was responsible for introducing Amy to drugs. And he still has their entire problematic relationship, with a history of aggression, betrayal and hospitalization together in a rehabilitation clinic. Amy Winehouse and Blake Fielder-Civil in a photo from 2007, when they were still married Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images/AFP In other words: there is concern among fans that the film leaves the story of the prodigy singer and her exceptional career as second flat. From what has been released so far, it seems that these issues so explored by English tabloids and gossip sites will have the same prominence as the musical part. In reality, the fear is that the prominence will be even greater. Of course, it is very complicated to analyze a complete work without having seen the film. The issue is that, for fans and part of the press, the producers are just wanting to profit from the most turbulent moments in Amy’s life. Furthermore, there are those who think it is too early to make a biopic of the singer. Amy died in 2009, aged 27. The images and stories of her death are still very recent and are clear in many people’s minds. It’s a very different case from what happened with biopics about other big stars, such as “Bohemian Rhapsody”, which told the story of Freddy Mercury almost 30 years after the singer’s death, and “Elvis”, which followed the life of the king of rock 45 years after his departure. Not to mention that much of the singer’s musical history unfolded at the same time as she faced a battle with drugs, alcohol and an eating disorder. And all of this, always widely publicized and without any reception. The musical phenomenon that Amy was is undeniable. But the question remains: how can we tell the artist’s musical life without mentioning all these battles? The director will have a great challenge in creating this art without harming the artist’s exquisite story. And suddenly, it would be worth listening to the fans, just like the producers of the film “Sonic” did, who back in 2019 received a lot of criticism when they released the first trailer for the film, and fans harshly criticized the animal’s appearance. The production went there and changed the design of the blue hedgehog. “One Love” Bob Marley Disclosure Amy’s film comes out in April. If the team finds the criticisms to be valid, they still have time to tweak the scenes or even postpone the release. This is no longer possible for the recently released “One Love”. But instead of the film being criticized by Bob’s fans, it was the critics who put their finger on the wound. The only praise is for actor Kingsley Ben-Adir, who plays the reggae icon. Just to give you an idea, Variety magazine wrote that the film “flirts with complexity, but slides into the banality of hero worship.” Time Out magazine said the film has “sincere intentions, but often falls into the banal”. The Guardian newspaper said that the film “doesn’t take off at all”. Slant Magazine took it a bit harsher and called the film “shaggy and disjointed.” And late film critic Roger Ebert’s website said the film is “devoid of perspective and originality.” Metacritic, a website that calculates an evaluation score based on critics’ reviews, is giving it 44 points out of a possible 100. To give you an idea, films with scores between 40 and 60 are considered average. In other words, “One Love”, according to critics, is almost at the level of badness. Perhaps fans, who were looking forward to a Bob film, 42 years after the singer’s death, will think differently, given the emotion of remembering a little of the artist’s story. Telling you a little about the film, it focuses on the years 1976 to 1978, after the singer suffered an assassination attempt. According to Ziggy Marley, who produced the film with his mother and sister, this was a transformative moment for his father and changed his worldview. Marisa Abela as Amy Winehouse, and Kingsley Ben-Adir as Bob Marley Reproduction/Instagram

[ad_2]

Source link