New high school: ‘We cannot allow a school to exist for rich young people and another for poor people’, defends pedagogue

[ad_1]

Disciplines such as ‘homemade brigadeiro’ have been gaining ground in the public school system to the detriment of more traditional curricula, such as history and sociology. Pedagogue explains how gaps in the grid increase inequalities. One year after the implementation of the new secondary education in all public and private schools in the country, authorities in the field of education are still evaluating how the implementation of changes in the students’ curriculum can be improved. In the state of São Paulo, the Secretary of Education, Renato Feder, says that he is considering reducing the options of the so-called training itinerary for students, which are sets of disciplines focused on one or more specific areas of knowledge. High school students in the classroom Gabriel Jabur/Agência Brasil The idea of ​​a flexible curriculum would be to contribute to professional education, with technical training geared towards the job market. In public schools, disciplines such as “homemade brigadeiro” end up gaining ground, to the detriment of more traditional curricula, such as history and sociology. Pedagogue Anna Helena Altenfelder argues that these still uncorrected gaps end up widening historical inequalities and precariousing the education of young people. “Any educational policy in Brazil needs, first of all, to think about tackling inequalities”, says Altenfelder in an interview with the podcast O Subject. “We cannot admit, nor allow that there is a school for the rich and another for the poor and that anything serves the majority of the population, quite the contrary. I cannot imagine what homemade brigadeiro can contribute to the development of the citizenship, for insertion in the labor market, for effective integral development. This is a risk that was already pointed out”, he says. Listen to the full interview on the O Subject podcast.

[ad_2]

Source link