Justice suspends act of councilors who removed Divino from Ferreira Gomes City Hall – News of Brazil
[ad_1]
Douglas Lima
Editor
In a preliminary decision, judge Luciana Barros de Camargo, from the District of Ferreira Gomes, suspended at the beginning of the afternoon of this Friday, 25th, the Legislative Decree of the Chamber of Councilors that removed João Álvaro Rodrigues, the ‘Divine’, from the position of elected mayor of the municipality that also names the representation of the State Justice in this unit of the state of Amapá.
In the decision, the magistrate Luciana Camargo determines the restoration of all of Divino’s rights to exercise the function for which he was elected, until the final judgment of the writ of mandamus. It also orders that the Municipal Legislative Power be summoned so that it takes the usual measures and that the authorities considered coercitors be notified, by a court official, so that they immediately comply with the judicial decision.
Still according to the decision of judge Luciana Barros de Camargo, the City Council of Ferreira Gomes has five days to appeal the judicial act. The Public Ministry, in turn, has ten days to manifest itself.
The Case
The writ of mandamus in favor of Divino was filed in the Comarca de Ferreira Gomes by lawyer Vicente Cruz, informing that a complaint had been presented to the Chamber of Councilors by citizens Luiz Fernando dos Santos Silva and Jackilb Amoras Furtado against irregularities that were being practiced by the mayor.
The complaint was discussed in ordinary sessions of the City Council, leading to the creation of two prosecuting commissions. Vicente Cruz stated that Mayor Divino was notified to present a prior defense, in both processing committees, on the 11th and 14th of the past, and that on the 23rd he presented a prior defense regarding the Process of Cassation of the Mandate of Mayor nº 001/2023.
The lawyer maintained that at the 25th Ordinary Session of the City Council of Ferreira Gomes, held on August 24, 2023, surprisingly and without any prior communication to the councilors, the President of the House of Laws put on the agenda, for voting, the Cassation without, for that purpose, the applicant, or his attorney-in-fact, having been summoned for the said act.
Leave your comment
Advertising
[ad_2]
Source link
