If there is crime in Barcelona, the victim is not Daniel Alves
[ad_1]
In the accusation of rape against Daniel Alves, the one who “transcends football”, according to the assessment of his personal attributes stated by coach Tite, there are two certain facts that no longer depend on proof: there was a sexual relationship in the nightclub, in Barcelona, and if there was a crime of abuse, the victim is not Daniel Alves.
I don’t know what Daniel Alves’ instincts are as a person. One for never wanting to hide this pride projected as arrogance. At this stage it is the negative feeling that acts to humiliate, embarrass and manipulate people.
But pride, when it goes beyond the limits of pride, becomes a traitor. And that of Daniel Alves is bigger than himself.
At first, he denied knowing the complainant. Afterwards, before the Catalan magistrate, he confirmed that there was a relationship, but in a consensual manner. It is not the lie of the first version, since from the legal point of view it has little value, although it can be taken as part of the evidence. The issue is to affirm the consensual character of the relationship, which indirectly increases the degree of offense to the complainant.
Being part of Daniel Alvez’s personality, perhaps pride will be an element to be considered in the analysis of the fact.
Another issue is the silence of Daniel Alves’ former teammates. Perhaps, it is an eloquent silence because they have full knowledge of the facts.
[ad_2]
Source link
