Fia wants to clear up drama of Alonso’s podium in Jeddah ahead of Australian GP
[ad_1]
The International Automobile Federation (FIA) promises to discuss this week the subject that became controversial at the end of the Saudi Arabian GP involving the third place of Fernando Alonso. After crossing the finish line behind the two Red Bull cars, and celebrating the feat, the Spaniard missed the podium in Jeddah for having been punished with ten seconds after the flag. Then, after Aston Martin protested, the decision was revised and the pilot ended up being reinstated in third place.
Faced with the controversy, the governing body of the entity wants to address the circumstances of the fact so that everything is clarified before the Australian GP, which is scheduled for April 2, for the third stage of the World Cup.
“The request to the Stewards to review the initial decision was made on the final lap of the race. The Stewards’ decision to hear and grant the Competitor’s Right of Review was a result of new evidence on the definition of ‘working on the car’ for the which there were conflicting precedents and this was exposed by this specific circumstance”, said one of the representatives of the entity that commands F-1.
At the start, Alonso was penalized five seconds for incorrectly lining up his car in the grid box. After getting the pole right away, he ceded the lead to the Mexican Sergio Pérez on lap number four and started to manage the difference to the leader of the race.
During the dispute, the two-time world champion ended up choosing to change tires when a safety car was triggered. Upon entering the pits, the mechanics waited five seconds before starting the operation. However, a monkey was leaning against the rear of the AMR23 and this detail ended up being the subject of a complaint, which led to a new sanction for the Spaniard.
With the loss of third place, Aston Martin, after a right of review, managed to have the decision annulled. In this way, Alonso had third place recovered and managed to celebrate his hundredth podium in his career in Formula 1.
“There was no clear agreement that could be invoked to require the parties to agree that a jack touching a car would amount to working on the car. In these circumstances, we felt that our original decision to impose a penalty on Car 14 needed to be reversed and we did so accordingly. deal,” said a race commissioner.
Faced with the impasse created, an FIA spokesman announced that the topic will be discussed at the next meeting of the Sporting Advisory Committee that will take place this Thursday to clear up any confusion for future events.
[ad_2]
Source link
