PL for pesticides: ‘Shame’, ‘Modernization of agriculture’; see repercussions after approval in Congress

[ad_1]

The agricultural sector celebrated the result; environmentalists consider that changes represent a risk to health. In fact, the proposal still depends on President Lula’s sanction. Pesticide packaging Jornal Nacional/ Reproduction The approval of the Pesticide Bill in the Senate this Tuesday (28) ended 24 years of processing the controversial proposal in Congress. Agricultural representatives celebrated the result. And environmentalists, who had dubbed the text approved in 2022 in the Chamber “PL do Veneno” or “poison package”, considered the result a setback for the country. To be valid, the text still needs President Lula’s sanction. See the impact below. Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock of Brazil (CNA) “The bill today brings coordination into the process, keeps all bodies responsible for the environment, health, agriculture involved in the evaluation of these products, but establishes a temporal parameter based on the type of product, that is, it now has temporal predictability in relation to the registration of these products, which brings some gains”, said Maciel Silva, deputy technical director of the Brazilian Confederation of Agriculture and Livestock (CNA). Greenpeace “It is a shame for Brazil to approve PL 1,459/22 in the week in which the 28th Climate Conference begins in Dubai. (…). The Poison Package contradicts the Brazilian government’s green agenda, as it will put even more pesticides in the food of the Brazilian population and contaminate the environment, prioritizing a toxic and unsustainable model of food production”, said Mariana Campos, spokesperson for Greenpeace Brazil. Croplife Brasil “The approval of PL 1459 is an important milestone for the advancement and modernization of Brazilian agriculture”, said the president of Croplife Brasil, Eduardo Leão. The entity brings together pesticide manufacturers. For Leão, the project creates more advanced and transparent processes, without giving up the strict technical-scientific criteria for approving new molecules. “If sanctioned, it should benefit Brazilian producers and consumers, who will have access to more sustainable, technological and effective products”, he states. Climate Observatory The Climate Observatory stated that the changes will end up “exposing Brazilian health to carcinogenic products and exposing our agriculture to embargoes abroad”. “Since the vote in the Chamber of Deputies, they have managed to achieve the main objective of pesticide manufacturers and their lobbyists in Congress: to eliminate the express prohibition that exists in the current law on the registration of carcinogenic, mutagenic and teratogenic products, or those that cause hormonal disorders The rest was nonsense, theater”, said Suely Araújo, the entity’s public policy coordinator. “Now someone will be able to generate reports, certifying that the pesticide has a risk of causing cancer, but that this risk is acceptable. This approval will create problems for the commercialization of our agricultural products. Shot ourselves in the foot!”, she added. (*intern, under the supervision of Ardilhes Moreira) Also read: Why does food production depend so much on pesticides?

[ad_2]

Source link