See the main points of the report on the project to combat fake news filed in the Chamber

[ad_1]

Deputy Orlando Silva’s opinion proposes holding networks accountable for damages caused by content posted by third parties. The House is expected to vote on the project next week. Deputy Orlando Silva (PCdoB-SP) filed on Thursday night (27), in the Chamber, his opinion on the project to combat fake news. In general terms, the text creates rules to criminalize the dissemination of false content and hold networks accountable for irregularities committed in their virtual environments. The House is expected to vote on the bill next week. See the main points: Responsibility of companies The text states that providers will be jointly and severally liable for repairing damage caused by content generated by third parties whose distribution has been carried out upon payment to the provider. Transparency The bill also stipulates that the provider and the platforms must request the identity, by presenting a document, of all platform and boost advertising advertisers. Remuneration for journalistic content One of the points defended by the rapporteur is the remuneration of journalistic activity by digital platforms. That is, that digital platforms pay for the use of content produced by journalistic companies and professionals in the sector. Freedom of expression The report also makes it clear that freedom of expression is a fundamental right of ISP users and that the prohibitions present in the law cannot restrict: the free development of the individual personality, free expression, artistic, intellectual, satirical content, religious, political, fictional, literary or any other form of cultural manifestation Children and adolescents According to the text, networks must immediately remove content that violates the rights of children and adolescents from the air. Parliamentary immunity The report extends parliamentary immunity to the social media environment. That is, deputies and senators cannot be punished for expressing an opinion. Robot accounts The rapporteur proposed that the project criminalize the dissemination of false content through automated accounts, the so-called robot accounts. Withdrawal of the supervisory entity The rapporteur, however, withdrew from the opinion the creation of an autonomous supervisory entity, which would function as a kind of regulatory agency. He stated that the idea was not well accepted within the Chamber, but that he will look for an alternative until next week to include in the text who should supervise the rules. Orlando Silva says that the final text of the Fake News PL will not have an autonomous supervisory entity that improves, not worsens the internet. And in an open letter, Google said that it works daily to address these issues, but that the bill may pose risks to user safety, and deserves more space for discussion and debate. Last week, a group of associations representing journalism companies released a manifesto in which they defended the Fake News PL. According to the companies, the project is necessary “in view of the dramatic effects of misinformation and hate speech” on society. He also stated that the appreciation of professional journalism serves as “an antidote to this social epidemic”. “As already occurs in other countries, the remuneration of journalistic activity by technology platforms can be a decisive element for the formation of a broad, diverse and healthy journalistic ecosystem, capable of opposing the spread of disinformation and hate speech. ecosystem is essential for the maintenance of democracy itself”, say the companies in the manifesto.

[ad_2]

Source link