Pacheco and Lira say that the goal of zeroing the fiscal deficit must be ‘pursued’ by the economic area

[ad_1]

Presidents of the Chamber and Senate participated in an event promoted by a private bank in SP. Lula has already said that the objective will ‘hardly’ be achieved and that wing of the government defends changing the target. Rodrigo Pacheco and Arthur Lira WALLACE MARTINS/FUTURA PRESS/ESTADÃO CONTÚDO; TON MOLINA/FOTOARENAESTADÃO CONTENT The presidents of the Senate, Rodrigo Pacheco (PSD-MG), and the Chamber, Arthur Lira (PP-AL), stated this Monday (6) that the goal of zeroing the deficit in public accounts must be “persecuted” by the government’s economic team. The senator and deputy gave the statements during an event organized by a private bank in São Paulo. The parliamentarians made the statements days after President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT) stated that the government will “hardly” meet the target, set by the economic team for 2024, of closing the hole in public accounts. The PT member’s statement provoked reactions from politicians and market agents. And a wing of the government started to defend a change in the target. At the event this Monday, Pacheco stated that he was “committed” to government proposals that seek a “sustainable” tax regime. “Before the Lula government took office, we approved a Transition PEC, which required a new fiscal regime, then we voted on a fiscal regime through the complementary law, if we established a deficit reduction target or zero deficit in Brazil, this target must be continually persecuted and searched for,” said Pacheco. After Lula’s statement, Pacheco had already released a statement, in which he said that not following the objective of eliminating the deficit “would put the country on a dangerous path.” At the same event in São Paulo, the president of the Chamber, Arthur Lira, was asked about the conflicts surrounding the government’s fiscal target for next year. The deputy from Alagoas said that he did not speak with President Lula or with the Minister of Finance, Fernando Haddad, about changing the objective set for 2024. “I did not particularly have any conversations, neither with President Lula nor with the minister Haddad or anyone from the government area, who came to confirm to me that they were going to modify the sending of the target”, he stated. “Minister Haddad ratified, in a meeting with us and publicly, that he will continue to pursue zero deficit”, added Lira. The president of the Chamber also highlighted that the preliminary report of the Budget Guidelines Law (LDO), which contains the fiscal target, should be voted on this week. “Our focus is to continue working to achieve [meta]. If you don’t achieve it, it’s not because you don’t want to, it’s because you couldn’t achieve it and, if you didn’t achieve it, there are the consequences of the framework that will be applied,” he stated. Government discusses whether it will change the target of zero deficit in public accounts; Míriam explains Proposals During a speech at the event in São Paulo, the president of the Senate also stated that the House should vote this week on the Proposed Amendment to the Constitution (PEC) for tax reform. For him, the proposal is one of the “most important” reforms to be carried out in Brazil. According to Pacheco, negotiations around the text should intensify this Monday so that the proposal reaches the Constitution and Justice Commission (CCJ) as “negotiated as possible”. He stated that, if the text is approved by the CCJ, it will be sent to the main plenary of the Senate, where it should be voted on between Wednesday (8) and Thursday (9). The parliamentarian also said that the Senate should analyze two other projects supported by the government that seek to increase revenue this year: the proposal that provides for the taxation of offshore companies (investments abroad) and exclusive funds (personalized investment funds for high-income people). income) text that regulates the sports betting and online betting market, such as virtual casinos STF Pacheco also commented on two texts that deal with the functioning of the Federal Supreme Court (STF). The first of these is a proposed amendment to the Constitution (PEC) that changes, among other points, the rules for requesting a review (extra deadline) and for individual decisions by Court ministers. The text was approved by the House Constitution and Justice Committee in October and is awaiting analysis by the plenary. In his speech, the president of the Senate said that he has always defended the Federal Supreme Court, but that the court cannot be “insusceptible” to criticism and improvements. “The Supreme Court must always be an arbiter equidistant from institutions, powers and society to be able to decide conflicts as the last word. This, for me, is a rule, this for me is very basic. However, it cannot be susceptible to criticism and neither is it susceptible to improvement,” he declared. Pacheco also stated that decisions that declare the unconstitutionality of a law must be passed by the Supreme Court. “What I defend is that the declaration of unconstitutionality of a law, which is made in the two houses of the legislative power, which passes through committees, which passes through 594 parliamentarians, which is sanctioned by the President of the Republic, this cannot happen through a decision of a single minister, this has to be a decision of the Supreme Court collegiate,” he said. A PEC is also being processed in the Senate that intends to limit the terms of office of Supreme Court ministers to 15 years and establish a minimum age of 50 to join the Court. Pacheco said that the measure could bring more “maturity” to the Supreme Court. “The logic of the Supreme Court minister’s mandate and the raising of the minimum age for entry into the Supreme Court is something that, first of all, serves the Federal Supreme Court itself very well to be able to give it its own dimension, as is the case with European countries. , giving it more maturity, oxygenating it from time to time”, he stated.

[ad_2]

Source link