Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo campaign against PL 490, which could change legislation for the demarcation of indigenous lands

[ad_1]

Actors made publications on social networks asking for support to sign a petition against the bill, which is on the agenda for voting in the Chamber of Deputies this Tuesday (30). Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo campaign against PL 490 Reproduction/Twitter Leonardo DiCaprio and Mark Ruffalo used their social networks to ask for support for a campaign against PL 490, which provides for the application of the time frame in the demarcation of indigenous lands. The bill states that only lands that were already traditionally occupied by indigenous peoples on the day the Federal Constitution was enacted, on October 5, 1988, can be reserved. 30). The actors shared links in which they ask for signature support in a petition against the bill. The text of PL 490 had the urgency approved last Wednesday (24) and may be voted on this Tuesday by the Chamber of Deputies. “Join me in supporting indigenous leader Celia Xakriabá, who is calling on fellow members of the Brazilian Congress to oppose the anti-indigenous bill PL490. Please sign the petition,” Leonardo wrote in a post posted on Monday (29). “The Brazilian government is being attacked by agribusiness. There is a war against indigenous peoples and forests. Our planet is at risk”, posted Mark Ruffalo, on Twitter. Initial plugin text Initial plugin text What does the bill 490/2007 foresee? PL 490/2007 determines that indigenous lands are those that were occupied by traditional peoples on October 5, 1988. In other words: proof of ownership of the land on the day of promulgation of the Federal Constitution is required. Under current legislation, demarcation requires the opening of an administrative process within the National Indian Foundation (Funai), with the creation of an identification and delimitation report prepared by a multidisciplinary team, which includes an anthropologist. There is no need for proof of ownership on a specific date. In addition to the implementation of the timeframe, the text also prohibits the expansion of lands that have already been previously demarcated, regardless of the criteria and claims by the interested indigenous peoples. There is also a point highly criticized by non-governmental organizations regarding a section of the project that would make room for more flexible contact with isolated peoples, which could pose a social and health hazard to the communities. Read also: Indigenous people protest against PL 490 and close MGC-135, in Norte de Minas Indigenous people block BR-101, in Greater Florianópolis, in protest against PL 490

[ad_2]

Source link