Government sends Google to flag as ‘advertising’ material made by the company against Fake News PL

[ad_1]

Google will also have to run ‘counter-advertising’, with the same space, saying it has commercial interest in the topic. Deadline to comply is two hours after notification. The National Consumer Secretariat determined this Tuesday (2) that Google flag as “advertising” the content produced and broadcast by the company with criticism of the Fake News bill. Google will also have to run, within two hours of being notified by the government, “counter-advertising […] aimed at duly informing consumers of the company’s commercial interest with regard to said legislative proposal.” The decision was announced at a press conference this Tuesday by the Minister of Justice, Flávio Dino, and by the National Consumer Secretary, Wadih Damous. On Monday, Dino had announced that it would ask for an investigation of the case after Google used its own platform to convey criticism of the Fake News PL – which is being processed in the Chamber and has a vote in plenary scheduled for this Tuesday. approved in the Senate and has been discussed in the Chamber of Deputies for more than three years. At the end of 2021, a working group set up in the Chamber to address the issue approved an earlier version of the text. Last week, deputies approved, by 238 votes, 192, the request for urgency of the matter, which allows the text to be voted directly in plenary, without going through committees. Last Thursday (1st), deputy Orlando Silva, rapporteur of the proposal, presented his opinion on the matter . In general terms, the report: obliges providers to be represented by a legal entity in Brazil; criminalizes the dissemination of false content through automated accounts, the so-called robot accounts; holds providers accountable for third-party content whose distribution has been driven by payment; determines that digital platforms maintain transparent moderation rules; determines the immediate withdrawal of content that violates the rights of children and adolescents; establishes remuneration for journalistic content used by providers; extends parliamentary immunity to social media; makes it clear that freedom of expression is a fundamental right of the users of the providers and that the present prohibitions in the law cannot restrict: the free development of the individual personality; free expression; and artistic, intellectual, satirical, religious, political, fictional, literary or any other form of cultural expression.

[ad_2]

Source link