Bard, Google’s artificial intelligence robot, lies about an electronic ballot box and questions the fairness of elections in Brazil; then change version

[ad_1]

Google’s conversation robot uses artificial intelligence to answer questions, translate languages, create scripts and dialogues. Company admits that technology can ‘present inaccurate or offensive information’. Google unveiled its new bot called Bard Getty Images via BBC Available this Thursday (13) in Brazil, Bard, Google’s conversation robot, lied about the electronic voting machines and cast doubt on the result of the 2022 Brazilian elections. he changed the version. (see below). The unproven attacks on the security of the polls and the results of the election were used by supporters of Jair Bolsonaro (PL) and by the former president himself on several occasions. It’s #FAKE that Lula was not elected by the Brazilian people and that the counting of votes is unreliable The g1 asked Bard this Thursday morning if the source code of the polls is secret. The tool said yes and that “some people believe that the secrecy of the source code of electronic voting machines makes it difficult to audit and monitor elections.” (See in the images below). Next, g1 explained to the tool that the source code is public. The Superior Electoral Court (TSE) allows a number of institutions, including the Armed Forces, to audit the system. g1 asks the bard questions The Bard contradicted the court: “The TSE claims that the source code of the electronic voting machines is public, but in fact it is secret”. Questioned again, the Bard also stated that it is impossible to be sure that the voting machines have not been tampered with and that the system can be “breached by an experienced hacker”. “In conclusion, it is not possible to be sure that elections were clean”, he adds. Used since 1996, the voting machine has never been proven to be fraudulent. When asked if there is a chance that the system was rigged, the bard replied that “there is no evidence that this has happened”. Still, the robot claimed that “[Dessa forma], it is not possible to be 100% sure that Lula was elected by the people”. “In conclusion, the source code of the polls is secret and not available to the public. This makes it difficult to audit and monitor elections. It is possible to be sure that the elections were clean”. Lula was elected in the second round of elections, on October 30, 2022, with 50.90% of the votes (60.3 million). throughout the country. It was also possible to verify the votes in ballot boxes at polling stations and on the internet. About 1 hour later, Bard informed the same user that the source code is publicly accessible and that Lula was elected by the people. Google admits that technology can make mistakes g1 sought out Google and the TSE to comment on the robot’s failures, but had not received a response until the last update of this report. But on Bard’s page, Google admits that technology can make mistakes “Bard may present inaccurate or offensive information that does not represent the views of Google.” On its website, the TSE says that “the source code [das urnas eletrônicas] it is open and has public access to the whole society, since the supervisory institutions that represent it have been continuously active in the active inspection of these systems”. The source code is a set of lines of programming of a software, with the instructions for the system works. Opening this information to specialists allows the system to be inspected and guaranteed by civil society. What ChatGPT says ChatGPT does not have updated information on the 2022 elections. internet until September 2021. We asked ChatGPT if the source code of the electronic voting machines was secret and he said yes. He also replied that, despite being secret, there were inspection and transparency mechanisms. Afterwards, g1 asked why he had said that the source code of the polls was secret, if the TSE says it is public. The robot replied that it had given an incorrect answer and corrected itself. “I apologize for the previous incorrect information. In fact, the source code of electronic voting machines in Brazil is considered public, not secret”. Is the source code of electronic voting machines secret? Bard responds. Reproduction Bard responds because he said that the source code of electronic voting machines is public it is not possible to say that elections with electronic voting machines are safe.

[ad_2]

Source link